Man Of Steel Review

Trying to review Man Of Steel is more difficult than you might think. You see it's like the egg fried chilli chutney sanwidge (see Red Dwarf) All the ingredients are wrong. The director is wrong, Zack Snyder is only slightly better than Michael Bay when it comes to hack direction. Just see 300 and Sucker Punch. David S. Goyer is infamous for balls-ing up his own scripts. Seriously he might have done the first take on Batman Begins but he is also directly responsible for both the abysmal Blade Trinity and Nick Fury, Agent of Shield (back when it was played by the Hoff. Seriously look it up) So he's hit and miss. Christopher Nolan, most famous for his Batman Films, is great with psychological stuff but that's just an aspect of Superman. Not the whole thing.  On top of that we have a complete reboot of the franchise. Always decisive.

These are all bad ingredients, but together they sort of worked. It's first hurdle was to set itself apart from the Chris Reeve movies, which it did. It's second was to not distance itself too much from the source, again made a good job of that. We got some nice motivation from Zod and Jor-El that played into the overall plot, but not enough exploration of that concept. At least for me, but more on that later.

Spoilers after the Jump but if you just want an arbitrary score, Good film that has it's flaws, but still very enjoyable. If you like action, Superman or just a couple hours of mindless entertainment go and watch but it ain't as good as it could have been

So, Jump

Doctor Who:-The Bells of St John

Alright, I might as well write a review about this episode. I've tried to write reviews for all the episodes recently but got nowhere with time being a problem. Still this episode deserves an in-depth look. Or at least as in depth as I can get.

First things first, the so called bells of StJohn. Yes it was the TARDIS phone ringing. Next. Well not quite, lets look at this point for a second. The Doctor has retreated to a 13th century monastery and taken up the role of a monk in an effort to find Clara, the woman twice dead. When you have a TARDIS, something that has access to pretty much all the information in the universe, it might take awhile but just throw the TARDIS randomiser on and travel. If you're going to bump into her you will. I love Steven Moffat's run on Doctor Who, but these pointless asides are getting grating.

The whole point was the phone call and the line "Some woman in the shop gave it me, supposed to be the best helpline in the universe." Fan theories are ten a penny as to who gave Clara the number to the TARDIS. Most people betting on River. Me, I'm leaning in the direction of either Amy or Rose. But I'm fairly sure that it's a dead end. It won't effect the overall mystery of who, or how Clara is who she is. Speaking of which, neither will this episode. Other than the Doctor meeting her I highly doubt what happens here is going to have more than a tangential impact on the overall story, much like the giant floating Eyeballs in Amy's first episode. Still they are the focus of this episode so that's what I'm going to look at

Dredd (AKA DREDD 3D)

Trying to write a review of Dredd is sort of difficult. In some ways even more so than Batman or Superman. Just about everyone knows the two DC characters so what about ol' Stony Face?

Well rather than pick a random point in it's history I'm going back to the beginning of the comic that spawned him, 2000AD, and going through a much condensed summery of his background both as a fictional character and how he came about. I'm fairly sure if the almighty Tharg finds out about this he's going to give me an enema with a Rigellan Hotshot for my impudence, but I'll have to learn to do with out sitting.

2000AD kicked off in 1977 when a bunch of writers for the British comic book industry were disillusioned at the lack of any serious story telling in the countries comic industry. The US had a recent boom in underground horror comics that rebelled against the stifling Comics Code Authority (Long story short, an independent group in the US that kept anything more graphic than a bruise locked away where innocent children couldn't learn about them) and we in the UK were still stuck with things like Korky the Cat. Well the boys were, for some bizarre reason comics aimed at girls were far more adult.

Timothy Dalton, the best Bond?

Alright I'm very late to this party, but on the other hand who cares. One of my presents this christmas was an iTunes Voucher, I know, I'm spoilt here and I used it to FINALLY get the fourth season of Chuck.

While it's not important to me I've always liked the show, just never had the time to get past the third year. So over the last week or so I've been watching the episodes and kicking myself over what I've missed. And the reason why could be summed up in two words:- Timothy Dalton.

Let's shoot, or at least wound, the elephant in the room; Dalton was and still is, in my opinion, the most underrated Bond. Often dismissed as the "oh yeah, him." of the Bonds. Not as infamous as Lazenby, nor as popular as Connery I still think he's one of the best Actors to play the role and deserves to be a lot more recognisable for roles outside of the franchise.

What do I mean by that? Simple; I say Connery and you think Bond. He's iconic in the role, that doesn't mean it's his only one though. Hunt for Red October and Highlander are two very strong roles but in the end he's always going to be Connery and you're always going to think Bond. It's the same as Leonard Nimoy and Spock. He's done hundreds of other roles but he'll always be that iconic character. The key difference is that Nimoy is a better actor.

Sorry he just is, for one if you asked him to play a Russian or Egyptian he wouldn't do it in a board Scottish accent! What does this have to do with Dalton? Simple, he's such a good actor that Bond shouldn't be the first thing you think. He should have a dozen roles fighting for attention. People should be discussing which role was his best and there should be a dozen answers.

Now his role, or roles, in Chuck have cemented this for me but go back and see what he's accomplished. The best way I've found to tell a good actor is to watch as many of their roles and interviews as possible and see where they overlap. Watch Dalton's Bond, then watch Hot Fuzz and throw in a bit of the Rocketter. Chuck shows his range, but I promise after seeing the last two I can forget about Bond. Which is harder than you'd think.

Still I'm going to look at that signature role. The biggest problem playing Bond is the layers. Connery pulled off a hard nosed, womanising killer with a sarcastic sense of humour that always came out when the more ridiculous things happened. Lazenby was the same man, sort of, but looking for a way out. He found that in his short lived wife. Connery's Bond was having too much fun to retire. Moore, well Moore was a wet lettuce. He's my least favourite, the humour was reduced to almost slapstick levels, the plots comical (Moonraker and Octopussy, Really?) and I still feel Moore himself played the role more slimy than smooth. Then came Dalton.

It was the end of the cold war, Russia was no longer the threat it once was and the more criminal elements Bond would go after weren't what they once were. The whole  atmosphere was changing. Now was the time for the old spy looking for retirement plot line, a man out of step with the current situation. And that's what we got, at the same time we got Bond. Datlon's take walked the knife's edge. A man that would do whatever was necessary with charm and skill, while at the same time knowing that his humanity was being stripped a wafer thin slice at a time.

Unlike Moore there's a cold anger to Dalton, while Connery laughed at the more incredible events Dalton made the quip to hide that vain of ice that would quickly turn to lava. Dalton's Bond has done things he's not proud of for queen and country, the shine has worn off. The glitz and glamour has unfortunately given way to the very 80's defeatism. Alright so the films were made in the late 80's but who cares if they were a little behind. They are far from perfect, but Dalton does a bang up job in both and it's a shame he didn't get the third film he was contracted for.

I'd also say he was influential. Both Brosnon and Craig have portrayed a darker, perhaps more sadistic, Bond than before. In some ways a much more flawed version of the role, following in his footsteps. Thanks to Dalton's portrayal James is a lot more human, not to mention more understandable now than the smug, self confidant Moore or the sarcastic, smirking Connery. Still he had the charm, wit, sophistication  and silver tongue necessary to pull off some fairly stunning stunts and cons.

But like I said that's not all. In the Rocketter he played Neville Sinclair. Basically Errol Flynn, if he was a Nazi sympathiser and spy (a whole kettle of worms I'm not going to go into, only to say that the character was undoubtedly based on the allegations). He played the character wonderfully; amoral, selfish and greedy. A monster who played at being a man, living it large in the spotlight at the hight of Hollywood glamour all the while being this dark evil force. As soon as the heroine scratched the surface she revealed the dark core.

Then we have Simon Skinner in Hot Fuzz. Another villain, but a lot different. By running the Supermarket he basically has a monopoly on the small town's shopping and a respected place in the community. While the true bad guys are a cabal of… well let's not give that away… Skinner obviously thinks of himself as the lord of the Mannor, going as far as to declare it his village. Again Dalton pulled out that sardonic wit to literally be the mustachio twirling vaudevillian villain. You can't help but laugh as he doesn't even bother to hide it this time.

Then comes Chuck, in which he plays three different people. The chief bad guy (noticing a pattern, well great actors always prefer that role, it let's them keep their teeth sharp), the bad guy playing a bumbling fool and a regretful father. I wouldn't call it a tour-de-force but it comes close. After all the above to see the character that Dalton ends up playing just proves that he's, after all that, a great actor.

I have to admit that I do feel a bit guilty going on for what is about one and a half pages of A4 about the guy, but the honest truth is I do respect him and feel that he is really under appreciated out there. I've said my piece, I hope I've made my point.

Thomas 

PS I'd be remiss if I didn't mention his stint on Doctor Who as Rassilon himself! While I hate that two parter with a passion that grows even more every time I see it the shear menace and bombast he made in the first half was brilliant. You felt the threat building in his actions and his delivery, while not at all subtile really made his lack of pay off that much worse. Seriously he could have at least walked around a bit. Just because he's talking doesn't mean he should stand around like a statue...

Favourite companions

A quick article for Doctor Who fans, mostly to prove I'm still around. My favourite companions. A few weeks ago there was a poll to see who fans thought was the Doctors best companion.

Needless to say the "Tennent is dreamy" portion of the fanbase, that wouldn't know a classic who story if it sat on them and wouldn't watch anyway, because they forgot to put the colour on some of them which is, like so dull. You know. Voted Rose to number one, because they're made for each other and, like, so sweet together, you know.

Sorry. The concept of Rose winning something hurts. She's awful, absolute tripe and very much the brainless bimbo I just mimicked. Just to clarify; she, upon meeting the Doctor, abandons her traumatised boyfriend and recently attacked single mother to go galavanting across time and space. At her first chance she brakes the first law of time and proceeds to unleash The Reapers upon an unsuspecting universe. Reapers that eat everything, including the Doctor. She then brakes into the Heart of the TARDIS, rips into the time vortex and through her actions kills the Ninth Doctor.

I could go on, including the brain fart quality idea of building a Dimension Cannon and jumping between the worlds (that just happens to parboil any world that she happens to intersect with, flinging them into the Void, AKA Hell, along the way). I could bring up that the last time we see her she throws the actual Doctor aside for his half human copy, because she can have sex with him. But I won't because it's not worth it.

In all seriousness Rose is a total irritating snot that only distinguishes herself from the other bog standard female companions by being bloody awful. I beg people, forget about her. Now. Please.

So in honour of this total disaster I'm going to hammer through my personal favourite companions and just why I like them. We've got fifty years to go through so there are going to be a few rules:-

First, we're only looking at TV companions. No radio, book, comic or audio drama. I'd love to go though them, but I honestly haven't experienced them all and I can't say this one and that one just because those I do know about. Someone has to draw the line someplace and that's going to be here. Sorry Big Finish, you deserve props but I can't be fair otherwise. Second, a companion has to travel in the TARDIS at least twice. There have been companions and there have been reoccurring characters. There is a difference. A companion enhances the story, a reoccurring character is there as a nod to continuity more than anything else. Companions have to be recognisable to the basic viewer and not a nerd that memorises script readings. If I pull an obscure reference to the 60's series it would be sort of pointless. And finally third, it's only the top five I'm hitting here. Yep, only five. I don't want to be here all week outlining the two dozen or so people he's travelled with. So top five is all your going to get here.

Well almost. There are our three honourable mentions, just for the hell of it. These  break all of the above. They that don't quite fit with my own rules, but I think they deserve noting anyway for one reason or another. Here we go:-

Sergent Benton

I love Benton, he was great. For those that don't know he was Warrant Officer for UNIT and the Brigadier's right hand man during the Doctors UNIT days. He always got the short end of the stick, being the one responsible for making the Brig's orders a reality. Armed with a Sten Gun and an endless supply of vain hope he'd be the one to organise and often lead the charge.

Still every so often he'd get on over his superiors. Either noticing a slight hole in the Brigs plan, ('Sir, we know bullets don't work. Shall I have the men throw rocks instead) to outright outfoxing some self-serving civil servant.

Benton only entered the TARDIS once and never flew anywhere in it. So he doesn't fit in the rules. Despite this Benton was always the glue that held the UNIT team together and did so as only a british solder could.

Wilf

Wilfred Mott. How can you not love Bernard Cribbins. You can see how all the actors had to sep up their game to match him, it's always fun to watch that happen. Another thing you can see is how Cribbins had a lot of impact into his character. The more he showed up the more you got the man behind the acting. Funny, witty and often not caring how people saw him Cribbins and Mott both give the impression he's just in it for the laughs. Then, when things got serious, so could he. Taking the weight and responsibility needed. There's not much more you can say. A funny, resourceful, and an all-round great companion. Offering a human perspective to the Doctor and his actions. The true job of the companion.

He never left Earth in the TARDIS, just bounced around London. He did end up in space in an alien ship but not anywhere else. Sorry Wilf, don't qualify.

K9

It's a god damn remote control robot. I don't care if you love him or hate him, it's a robot dog portrayed by an over complicated RC car. If you hate him, you're hating an inanimate object. It's like hating a brick. Same if you like him. It's a testament to the Writers and the Actors (some of which hated the prop, for good reason) that it was still part of the ensemble. The prop would often spin out of control, break down, malfunction and generally create havoc. Leaving actors either sprawled on the floor or lifting it up on to tables just to keep it in shot. On the other hand K9 was the Doctor's computer. A portable multi-tool, sort of like a swiss army knife with a Calculator and a personality. During his travels with the Doctor K9 was the Sonic screwdriver of his era.

Unfortunately K9 isn't real, he's mostly crude special effects. I can't include him, but he is the main reason for these honourable mentions. 

Donna

My first reaction to Catharine Tate was "God no, no not again!". I hate, loath and despise stunt casting. It's pointless and is often just done for a promotional boost. Tate is more well known as a comedian and I can't begin to explain how much I hate her "comedy". It isn't funny. It's lowest common denominator humour, including a swearing granny and an ignorant school kid.

Still Donna proved that Tate could act. Not just act, but act well. Donna is one of the very few companions that actually evolved and developed over their span with the Doctor. She was integral to the overall plot and was fun. Donna showed a sharp human perspective and a close relationship with the Time Lord.

Unfortunately she was involved in End of Time. This means she is automatically thrown out of the list. I hate that two parter THIS much. Two words, the second is off.

On to the final five…

Number 5:- James McCrimmon

Jamie McCrimmon, Piper to the Clan McLaren, is one of the longest serving companions and there is a very good reason for it. He was brilliant. Not some wide eyed teenage girl who thinks everything is brilliant. Jamie was a fighter as much as the Doctor is a thinker. Whenever he's captured Jamie's first reaction is to draw his knife, his second is to hit it with a rock.

There has never been a companion more trustworthy than Jamie. Always ready to leap into action when needed, he'd be sarcastic with the Doctor sure but always do what was asked of him. 

Often referred to as "The Boy" Jamie always came second place. It not just recently that the Doctor has travelled with attractive young women. Each time the second one did Jamie spectacularly fails to get anywhere. He's always seen as the big, or little, brother, but that helps pull the whole family together.

Other than that it's hard to pin down why Jamie is so likeable, it's just that Frazer Hines, the actor behind the character, did such a good job you can't help it. It's important to note that whenever they brought the Second Doctor back for a special they always included Jamie, without fail. The two are inseparable and played off each other greatly. 

Speaking off…

Number 4:-  Romanadvoratrelundar

Romana. Ahh Romana. The first of the companions to match wit's with the Doctor and often win. As a companion the first Romana wasn't that impressive. In the space of a year she went from independent woman to girl hostage all together too quickly. Often dismissive of the Fourth Doctor's quirks she came to rely on him far more than her own wits. Still, because she was the first time we go to really know a Time Lady we also got to know more about the people the Doctor came from. She gave us a better idea of just how much a rogue the Doctor really was. We saw that he's not only a stranger to us, she helped show us just how much of an alien he is to his own people as well.

Then came the second Romana. Regenerating gave her and us a new perspective on how things were. She could now see the fun the Doctor had with his travels and joined in. In this persona Romana was very much there to learn from the Doctor. She was his trainee, learning more about how to survive in the universe out there, beyond the bubble that the Time Lords had created for themselves.

This was a great development. She was still clever in her own right, but saw the Doctor's experience as a resource to be tapped. As she became more comfortable with what she learnt Romana often took actions on her own that helped, leading up to her leaving the Doctor to find her own path with what she had learnt. This means that Romana grew and developed positively, a lot more than many that came before and several that have come since.

One of the big points in Romana's favour is the chemistry between Lalla Ward and the then Doctor, Tom Baker. Put simply it just works. No wonder they got married in the real world. 

Number 3:-Amy Pond

How can you not love Amy Pond. She's beautiful, passionate and well rounded. She's having as much fun as the Doctor with these adventures, laughing her head off, crying, running and treating it as a game. Thing is, it more or less is a game. Amy's life with the Doctor in it is a fairy tale. Rory might be her Prince Charming but the Doctor, well the Doctor is her playmate. He's the one who is always there to play the game. To run off with and be a child again without any real world problems.

This is addressed and again becomes part of the story as a whole. The arc plot comes out of the character and their interactions with everyone else, rather than just something that was tacked on to every episode. Amy's important to the overall story line. You could replace not companions in Classic Who stories with little impact on the plot, for example take Victoria from Tomb of the Cybermen and replace her with Tegan Nothing would happen. Replace Amy with anyone else and three years make no sense what-so-ever. Heck anyone could have taken Donna's role in Stolen Earth, just because she was the one to touch the hand doesn't mean Martha couldn't have been the one to do it, or Jack, or some random kid in the street.

Amy Pond is one of the best examples of continuity in recent Doctor Who and stands out amongst her fellow companions because she's important, very important to the over all story and plot.

Number 2:- Sarah Jane Smith

If the chemistry between Ward and Baker was important Sarah Jane needs a place on this list. Elisabeth Sladen was a fantastic actress that somehow knew how to get along with anyone. Be them Baker, Pertwee or the whole cast of her own spin off. No matter the era or the cast Sladen sold the part, she was Sarah Jane. Just as much as Tom Baker was, and still is, the fourth Doctor. There is no way around it.

As for the character, Sarah Jane was brilliant too. Again she was a strong female character that started of strongly and was along on the ride for the fun of it. She also provided a perspective for the Doctor. For the first time the companions opinion held weight with the Doctor, not just some random person. Offering ideas and possible solutions that, in fact, work. More often than not.

Romana might have been a trend setter but if it wasn't for Sarah Jane there wouldn't have been the foundation for her, or any of the other strong females in Doctor Who. Speaking of our, well my, number one…

Number 1:- Ace

Ace. The wise cracking, violent, teenage girl. On the run from her hated mother, sucked into a time storm by a secondary school experiment in explosives that went wrong and left on a floating prison (that just happened to be converted into a super market where people got frozen…) where she was left as a trap for the Doctor by the embodiment of an ancient evil from before the beginning of the universe…

Need I say more? That's her backstory, A backstory that we learn over her tenure with him.

All the other companions before led up to Ace. In more ways than one way she is the ultimate combination of all the companions I've listed above. Sophie Aldred's chemistry with Sylvester McCoy was perfect, the pair of them attacked their respective roles with gusto. Combine this with surprisingly strong writing (when given a chance) and Ace was great. As a character she easily came off as an adopted foster child to the Doctor. Often arguing with him when she felt he was wrong Ace wasn't perfect, she was human. Written as one and accepted as one.

A can of nitro 9 in one hand and bucket worth of issues in the other whole adventures in the final years of Classic Who dealt with what Ace was going though, and a the same time it never overshadowed anything else that was happening. Ace hit a balance that, even in the face of Amy Pond and all of the above, still shows people how to write for a companion

There is one more I have to bring up. He's not a companion according to my rules and some people argue that he's not one anyway but I can't not mention him. The Brigadier.

Alistair Gordon Lethbridge-Stewart. Not only does he have one of the longest names in Sci-fi fiction the Brig, as he his known, has the greatest fake mustashe in history, the least military barnet you can possibly imagine and finally the most unconventional army in history.

The Brig has done it all with the attitude you can only get from being a serving officer. Founding UNIT, teaming up with five versions of the Doctor (seven if you include the First Doctor on the monitor in three Doctors and Dimensions in Time), and meeting a future version of himself. The Brig has, quite honestly, seen it all. From Daleks to Yetis, the Loch Ness Monster to giant robots re-enacting King Kong. All the while grouching about the utter uselessness of bullets. 

Always a professional, even when it doesn't work in the insane world he has to try and survive the Brig deals with things the only way he knows how. Shoot at it until someone gives him another option. He is the everyman that try his best yet somehow his attitude ends up disarming his opponents even better than he knows. Presented with a trained and experienced solder a lot of half baked lunatics or alien invaders panicked. His no nonsense approach also endeared him to the viewer. Playing the stereotype to the hilt, yet still believable.

Got a favourite yourself add it to the comments. Until then I'll see you september 1st with Asylum of the Daleks and the beginning of the end for the Ponds… 

TGWTG recent "issues" Open letter

The worst thing about this is I'm wadding in at the last minute, but I've just got to fire this off to both people involved. Lupa (AKA Allison) and Spoony (AKA Noah) In all perfect seriousness what in the blue **** just happened? Lets be serious here, guys I'm just a humble follower and I find both your works fun, often informative and very entertaining. You are both, in my opinion, clever, resourceful and witty people that I would like to hold a conversation with. So seeing what's been happening I'm absolutely stunned. I hope you both read BOTH parts to this to see that there is in fact a middle ground here. Noah, to quote: "you're tailspinning man" you really are. For about a year now you've been getting more and more vitriolic and a lot darker in your presentation. I know that what we see in your video is just a group of characters, but sometimes I think they're wrapped up a bit too much in the real you. On the other hand your tweets are not "in character" and those have been the true indication I might be right. You, of all people, have to admit what was said was insulting, offensive and in extreme bad taste. Now in private that's fine, but Twitter is a public arena and unfortunately so are you. Were a noted celebrity to make that comment, or a famous comedian try it, it would be all over the news. In fact I invite you to read up on what happened to two british "comedians" that made a rather unfunny phone call here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Russell_Brand_Show_prank_telephone_calls_row There are a lot of parallels here, and quite frankly you should be above that. The truth is you were in the wrong and should have apologised almost immediately. However, on the other hand… Allison, you rode that horse right into the ground didn't you? This was only meant as a joke, anyone could see that and while it was personally offensive there, perhaps, were other ways to deal with it? A Skype call or even a firm E-mail might have been better. From what I've followed on twitter and read on your blog you came very close to decrying Noah to be a witch and ordering him burned. Alright that's not true, but there were lots of other ways to handle it Especially as you had only a peripheral involvement at best. From what I can tell Hope had basically shrugged it off. Sure Noah damaged his reputation and lost respect from a lot of people, respect he can never get back, but how is this your issue? It's right to stand up for what you believe in and rape is never, ever funny. Even the threat is wrong. This is a crime that has long lasting and frankly disguising results ranging from massive physical damage (even permeant disfigurement) to life long psychological trauma. That is not something to take lightly and is deeply offensive to anyone who takes the time to acknowledge it. However this issue was blown up so out of all proportion simply because A:- Noah, a politely worded post on your site, admitting you were out of line, would have solved nearly everything and allow this wound to scab over. It wouldn't have cost you anything and would have gone along way. B:- Allison, its alright to be personally offended by something you find repugnant but there are ways to go about things. Flying off the handle as you did backs people into corners. Sooner or later they are going to turn on you and what happens is never pleasant. I know this has probably fallen on deaf ears because you have both backed into respective corners and are being bombarded from all sides but I had to make my points I do hope you read this and that at least some of it makes sense. I will continue to follow both of you and admire your work. Thomas

Bully the Movie

Bullying

Here's something interesting, at least to me. Bully the Movie.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1682181/

Basically somebody has realised that bullying is an issue that needs highlighting once again and has made a rather shocking (if of course you lived on the moon or were teachers) documentary showing a small sample of the abuse many alienated young people suffer.

Now I'm not going to go on into a long background about the movie, but there are a few points I want to make. First of all the MPAA, the gang over in America responsible for their rating system, gave it too high a rating for it's target audience (around 18, or their equivalent over there). Apparently it "contained scenes that may be shocking to younger people". I am forced to ask; what like? Teenage boys and girls being attacked by gangs, insulted and emotionally abused to the point were some go as far as to take their own life? Yes, that is something young children should be protected from… but hiding it away encourages it you feckless fools! That the MPAA did not know this tells me that they are among the hundreds of thousands out there that think just because they don't see it happening it doesn't.

Fortunately this rating has been effectively repealed and the film is now able to be seen by those that most need to see it. The problem is I don't think it can do much good and I have the experience to tell you why.

Now I'm not going to suddenly announce that I was one of the many victims, the fact is don't see myself as that. I can however emphasise. I was regularly bullied in school one way or another. At least twice, without warning, I was attacked and several times chased by groups. Once I was even knocked out, briefly. I regularly had gangs of all ages (even younger than I was) hound me, throwing out insulting nick names. Mostly plays on my last name Fishwick; these included Dick-wick, Fishy-dick and other obvious penis related jabs.

I am not saying I've had the worst of it, or that other people should just grow up and accept it but wasn't pleasant.

Other, more creative insults came about with rumours of me being sexually attracted to my own, then as now deceased, grandmother and Bea Arthur for some reason. People I did not know in the slightest would hound me after school with these taunts and others. When I responded (usually physically to their great amusement) it would be me that got in trouble with teachers for being violent. Again becoming some great cosmic joke.

Often leading to me losing my lunch times and being forced to remain in detention for an hour or more after school. On on occasion I was even held back a class because I lashed out during a lesson (a lesson I could not hear because I had four other pupils openly talking about my so called sexual habits). There were other problems, but I'm sure you get the idea.

This of course continued until I got to college. At which point I became the focus of a whole new level of amusement. My work with Scouts made me a pedophile, other people began asking obviously inane questions until distraction. Imagine being forced to tell the same moron that despite coming from a small town you do not in fact have six toes (all on one foot) and that you're not married to a sister you do not have.

None of this made me suicidal, but I can understand how people could fall into despair. Especially without support. I also know I am not alone out there in the big wide world. The problem is there is no easy fix, one movie no matter how powerful can change it and there is one simple reason why.

Social structure.

We are naturally a social animal. We gravitate towards those we feel connected to, either through shared opinion or occurrences. We make friends who we feel comfortable around because we can talk to them and we avoid people we can't. As a people we humans need that structure, that society and that bond. Without it we all feel that most painful and obscure hurt. Loneliness.

This is where bulling comes from, people seeking to establish their own friends the only way they can think, by alienating someone else. Bullies are so afraid of the loneliness they see in others that they go out of their way to stop it. Causing it wherever they go because if they stop they are terrified they will become the bullied. Literally shouting at the top of their voice everyone else's problems, so no one will look to closely at their own.

Highlighting this alone isn't going to help anything. It's primal, rooted so far down that we can't pull it out. Our only hope is to acknowledge it, face fear and ignorance head on and battle with it. This is why people ignore it, because they don't want to see it in themselves. This is why they do it, because they are the one's that are too afraid to accept who they are. I have seen people change their whole personalities to fit in

This is why I pity them, not myself. I'm glad to be unique, not one of the crowd. I'm not afraid of who I am. A short, irritating know it all with bad teeth, short temper and an attitude to match. I am me in defiance to all those people and I actually think them for that.

Before I sign this off thI do want to say two things. I don't know if we're going to get this film over here (UK) but if you're in the US support it as best you can. Despite my reservations. I might not sound wholly positive about the out come but I have been wrong often and very rarely have I wanted that to be proven more than I am here.

Second is to repeat the thing I said when my mother and I had a meeting with my teachers about the whole thing. My tutor said:- "Thomas has difficulty communication with his peers." I responded by looking at the moron and saying "You're not calling those people my peers are you?"


Thomas